Near-field testing (NFT) is another of many electromagnetic techniques used to inspect heat exchanger tubes.

NFT was first developed as an alternative to magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing.

How it works

NFT technology uses two coils — a transmitter and a receiver. Typically the receiver coil is close to the transmitter coil, taking advantage of the transmitter’s near-field zone — that is, the zone where the magnetic field from the transmitter coil induces strong eddy currents, axially and radially, in the tube wall.

NFT probes operate within the same frequency range as remote-field testing (RFT) probes.

NFT is specifically suited to detecting corrosion, erosion, and pitting inside carbon steel tubing. NFT is perfect for fin-fan tube heat exchangers because eddy currents do not go through the wall of the tube. NFT is also much more sensitive to defects close to structures such as support plates and tubesheets.

Benefits

  • Fast
  • No need for an external reference coil
  • Easy to use
  • Unaffected by structures such as support plates and tubesheets

Detection Capabilities According to Defect Type

Defect/Tech ECT ECA IRIS RFT NFT NFA MFL PSEC
ID pitting

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

OD pitting

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Acceptable, but limited

Not suitable 

Not suitable

Acceptable, but limited 

Acceptable, but limited 

Axial cracking

Acceptable, but limited

Excellent

Not suitable

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

Not suitable

Acceptable, but limited

Circumferential cracking

Acceptable, but limited

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

ID corrosion

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

OD corrosion

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

At tubesheet

Acceptable, but limited

Excellent

Excellent

Acceptable, but limited

Not suitable

Not suitable

Acceptable, but limited

Acceptable, but limited

Excellent

Acceptable, but limited

Not suitable

Sizing Capabilities According to Defect Type

Defect/Tech ECT ECA IRIS RFT NFT NFA MFL PSEC
ID pitting

Good

Excellent

Excellent

Good

Not suitable

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

OD pitting

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Good

Not suitable 

Not suitable

Not suitable 

Not suitable

Axial cracking

Good

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Good

Not suitable

Not suitable

Circumferential cracking

Not suitable

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Good

Not suitable

Not suitable

ID corrosion

Good

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Not suitable

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

OD corrosion

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

At tubesheet

Good

Good

Excellent

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Not suitable

Excellent

Good

Not suitable

Suitability According to Tubing Material

Material/Tech ECT ECA IRIS RFT NFT NFA MFL PSEC
Non-ferromagnetic Tube

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Integral finned tube

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Low ferromagnetic Tube

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Integral finned tube

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ferromagnetic Tube

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Integral finned tube

No

No

Limited

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Aluminum finned tube

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes